Saturday, August 24

Col. James Wardlowe's (or Wardlow's) Dragoons

Further troops have joined the ranks in the form of the first part of the second Dragoon regiment - this time Parliamentarian's and representing the dragoons commanded by Colonel James Wardlowe (or Wardlow, or Wardley, or Wardlace for I have seen them all used!)..



In the battle the unit was deployed as below (black arrow and circle)

By Jlorenz1 - own creation, CC BY 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2155575
From the Battlefields Trust site..   "..On the right wing Balfour was extremely weak in cavalry, because a substantial number of troops of horse had not yet reached Kineton. Here again Essex chose his ground well and was able to take advantage of the hedged enclosures that flanked the field on this side. He deployed 700 dragoons to line these hedgerows in support of Balfour. With his right wing thus protected from an outflanking cavalry move, he could afford to deploy at least some of the small number of horse on this wing behind the foot. This was to prove a key decision, for it was to protect them from Wilmot’s charge and enable them to play a crucial role later in the battle....." my highlight...  the unit in question is my boys..



If the terrain on that flank was best suited to defence by dragoons then but it also suited a dragoon attack and in the battle this was how it transpired..  Wilmot, the Royalist left wing commander, ordered his own dragoons forward, probably Washington's, to clear the hedgerows (which they did) which allowed the Royalist cavalry to charge. The result was pretty much the same as Rupert's charge on the other flank, with the Parliamentary (and Royalist!) cavalry disappearing into the distance..

So what of Colonel James Wardlow (or Wardlowe etcetcetc)? I have managed to find next to nothing..  but...

In one of my trusted and trusted sources ("A Military History of the English Civil War, 1642-1646: Strategy and Tactics" by Wanklyn and Jones) I found this reference describing him as a 'professional soldier' ...


...which is interesting indeed as it implies Wardlow survived Edgehill with reputation untarnished...   

In "Plymouth and Devonport : in Times of War and Peace" (Whitfeld, published 1900) it says that the siege [of Plymouth] did not start in earnest until September, 1643..  Exeter had gone over to the King, and Parliament realising the fall of Plymouth would be almost as catastrophic as losing Bristol, acted as follows..

"Colonel Wardlow was sent from Portsmouth in command of a company of Roundheads [I have seen various reports of the size of this force but it seems to have been 500-600 strong and travelled by ship], with instructions to maintain the defence. At the outset, however, St. Nicholas Island was 
nearly betrayed by Sir Alexander Carew, whose honesty was suspected by Philip Francis, 
the Mayor".


Following the arrest of Carew (who was subsequently beheaded with the same axe they had used for Stafford!)..

"Maurice hemmed in the town and no provisions entered it for several weeks. An attempt was then made to raise the relief, and the Roundheads, outflanking the enemy at Plympton and Hooe, seized several of the "malignants". Colonel Wardlow made a similar dash upon a heavy guard of Cavalier horse at "Knockers Hole," with an insignificant force of musketeers, and the besiegers fled towards "Roborow" Down. The Roundheads, in their exuberance, continued the pursuit "too farre," and narrowly escaped annihilation"

...and in another source..

"In November 1643 immediately after the reduction of Mount Stamford by Maurice and while all men stood in doubt of the issue Colonel James Wardlow governor of Plymouth gave orders for securing this Island which at that time from presumed culpability of four deputy lieutenants to whom its defence had been was utterly destitute of provisions and ammunition. Both the Fort and Island were in consequence revictualled and the garrison strengthened by which means and by employing officers of approved fidelity this important barrier was effectively occupied and secured from danger" ("BATH AND BRISTOL With the counties of Somerset and Gloucester Displayed in A Series of Views" BRITTON John, SHEPHERD Thomas Published by Frank Graham, 1829)

Clearly a man of some skill and experience..  


So...  Peter Pig, 15mm, painted August 2019, stay tuned for the dismounted version and horseholders...

22 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Cheers Paul - despite my brush butchery the Peter Pigs just shine.. they are a lovely cast/sculpt..

      Delete
  2. Great looking little regiment and wonderful info; the siege of Plymouth sounds like it might make for a nice little campaign.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Codsticker, and you're not wrong about the siege/campaign.. boat landings, small skirmishes, sallies, it has them all, and was one of the Parliamentary success stories of the war as Plymouth was never taken despite the siege lasting until 1646

      Delete
  3. A fine addition Steve, and an informative blog as usual.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good looking dragoons and as far as 17th century views on spelling is concerned" it is a poor man who can only spell a word one way" Johnson!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! Very apposite Ian/Iern/Iain/Ieuan... etc

      Delete
  5. Looking forward to viewing your grand review, or failing that the table overview of the next battle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Murdock - it's coming ... need to balance up the forces a little first - not sure how it happened but I'm low on Royalist units.. :o)

      Delete
  6. Good looking unit. I have to admit the ECW keeps popping up in my interest radar in recent years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ta Matt.. I have a real thing for black powder warfare... this is my 3rd project in the period and I'm not convinced I'm done yet, as Napoleonic's was my first love (after WWII), so never say die.. !

      Delete
  7. Nice potted history, and useful for my own 6 mm armies. I've just restarted my interest in the ECW and have raised tow small armies. They may combine to fight the Polish or Turkish armies I have though I really intend a small campaign in a limited area. Two local luminaries fighting for King or Parliament.
    Good luck with your project

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Khurusu - I've bookmarked your blog for later reading!

      Delete
  8. Another fine addition Steve and more interesting background reading. 'Skirmish at Knockers Hole' would make a great game title I'm sure!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cheers Lee.. the project is slowly growing, and the research on the siege of Plymouth that came about because of it was an unexpected pleasure...! So we learn " Knockers Hole is a real place in Cornwall, at St. Germans near Plymouth but, besides the geographical relevance, the name provides a pun: among the possible meanings of knockers there is “person of striking appearance” (OED 1.c), whereas a common usage of hole was “orifice,” often in the vulgar sense of genital organs" ....for real... LOL :o))

      Delete
  9. An interesting history to go with another nice unit! :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many thanks FOGH.. the dismounted version nears completion...

      Delete
  10. I'm liking these regimental overviews Steve. And the associated histories. I've got a general question if you don't mind me asking. Do you have standard sizes for units or do you vary the number of bases?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Nundanket.. standard sizes.. four bases per unit, I model unit strengths/quality by points score in a roster.. no base/casualty removal either - I don't go to all the bother of painting the little guys for them to be taken off the table at the first sign of powder smoke.. :o))

      Delete
    2. 'I don't go to all the bother of painting the little guys for them to be taken off the table at the first sign of powder smoke' Hah! Don't blame you.

      Delete
    3. I'm paraphrasing, but I think it was Featherstone who said he didn't go to all the bother of painting soldiers for them to be put in a drawer once a unit took casualties... makes sense to me... :o) When you use standard sized units in a big game with casualties recorded on roster it's a nice additional fog of war as your opponent needs to be sharp to remember whether the unit he faces is full strength or hanging on by a thread... LOL..

      Delete