Saturday, February 7

"Firing into the Brown" #99 - mines, claims and stuff

"So Carnehan weeds out the pick of his men, and sets the two of the Army to show them drill and at the end of two weeks the men can manoeuvre about as well as Volunteers. So he marches with the Chief to a great big plain on the top of a mountain, and the Chiefs men rushes into a village and takes it; we three Martinis firing into the brown of the enemy".

Kipling "The Man Who Would Be King"

Time for another update..  just a short one... 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Meanwhile....  out in the Solent... (😁)

Russian warship deploying a moored contact mine.
Painting by the French artist Louis Charles Bombled (1862-1927)

Russian Sailors Saluting a French Transport (Marins russes saluant un transport francais )
also by Bombled

....shades of the excellent Siege of Portsmouth

To be fair though, the first picture is from a series illustrating the Russo-Japanese War, and the second is from the book "La Guerre a Madagascar" (by H Galli) 😁

Could find very little about Bombled - he was hugely prolific though, and his military subjects definitely appealed to me. There's more than a shade of "Look and Learn" about them (and if nothing else does, that dates me!)..  

More pictures here [clicky] if you fancy a look..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

It was midday in the the peaceful (😏) town of Cedar Gulch, and "Nugget" Turner (Joe to his mom) had just stepped out of the Assay Office where he'd been depositing his latest finds..

It was one of his three monthly visits to town to stock up on chewing tobacco, flour, and salt before he returned to his remote and lonely claim two days ride up in the mountains behind the town where he mined and dug for copper.. 

He'd leave tomorrow morning.. before that there was time for a long soak in a bath, followed by a glass or two of something in the Saloon, a good steak dinner, and then perhaps a visit upstairs to see if any of Ma Kelly's girls were free....

Across the way in the Saloon though, envious eyes had followed him into the office, and then across the street towards the barber.. pausing only to finish his drink, Bart (Bartholomew to his mom..  or rather that is when she was sober enough to remember it..) Johansson had seen enough, that was the third deposit to the Assay Office in the last two days... time he let the boss and the boys know that their was rich pickings to be had..

πŸ˜€

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

 Laters, as the young people are want to say...   and maybe that game...

Saturday, January 31

Attack on Brill - setup and game..

Time for another update..  and a game for once, a vaguely historical refight of an actual engagement in the English Civil War - the Attack on Brill - which was promoted by a post on Farcebook by the excellent Battlefields Trust

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Historical background.. 

December 1642, and after their defeat at Turnham Green and their subsequent withdrawal to Oxford, the Royalists had established winter quarters for their army in the towns and strategic points around their new capital. 

Banbury, Reading and Abingdon were major garrisons but others, like Wallingford, Burford and Islip guarded important crossings of the Thames and its tributaries. Then to the east of Oxford there were a number of small garrisons in Buckinghamshire, there purely to retain their control of the county - one such garrison was established in the small hilltop village of Brill. 

Worth noting that the village was equidistant between Oxford and Aylesbury - roughly 15 miles from each but slightly closer to Oxford..

The village had been an important royal manor during the Middle Ages, but in the December of 1642 was home to two Royalist Lancashire foot regiments, under Lord Molyneux and Sir Gilbert Gerard, who proceeded to fortify it with banks and ditches around the church. 

The nearest Parliamentary garrison was at Aylesbury. There, Colonel Arthur Goodwin the Parliamentary Commander-in-Chief for Buckinghamshire, had three foot regiments (Bulstrode's, Holmstead's and Tyrell's) along with his own regiment of horse and Browne’s Regiment of Dragoons. 

Portrait of Arthur Goodwin in about 1639 by Anthony van Dyck

Goodwin had decided to eliminate the Royalist presence in Brill, and marched out of Aylesbury in late January with his horse, Homestead’s Regiment of Foot, and Colonel Browne’s Dragoons but he also had with him two pieces of ordnance (described as sakers [clicky] ie. slightly smaller than a 6pdr) in order to breach the defences. 

The refight..

Parliamentary entry point is bottom of table..


...with a church and village, surrounded by makeshift earthworks

Royalists deploy within the earthworks

OOB:

Royalist:

All regular foot, and at full strength (6 Strength Points or SP)

  • Charles Gerard's Regiment of Foot
  • John Belasyse's Regiment of Foot (standing in for Molyneaux's)
Parliament:

All units are regular and at full strength (6 SP)
  • Brooke's Regiment of Foot (for Homestead's)
  • Gramson's Horse (for Goodwin's)
  • Wardlowe's Dragoons (for Browne's)
Scenario specific rules:
  • Rules will be my SYW variant [clicky]
  • It seems likely that the sound of gunfire would clearly have been heard in Oxford which was only 12 miles away, so I am also assuming that there was a clear need to get this done quickly - my moves are quite short in terms of time so the scenario is limited to 15 turns (roughly two or three hours)
  • Artillery ammunition was not plentiful at the time [clicky], and as this was also a bit of a flying column, I'm assuming Goodwin didn't bring a lot with him - the guns are therefore limited to 10 shots between them (ie. 5 each)
  • I am going to assume* the earthworks were not substantial as the Royalists had only arrived in December, and Goodwin attacked in January - so they would be almost trenches with a raised parapet. Accordingly, each earthwork section is worth 3 SP's, once this is reduce to 0 by any artillery fire (only) that section is removed... 
* This is probably an unsafe assumption, but I have done it for playability reasons, as normally an assault on a fixed and defended position needs a clear 3 or 4 to 1 advantage (if I had been Goodwin, I would have brought both the other foot regiments with me, and probably any other units I could scrounge or lay my hands on as well. Shock and awe always works...😏) 

The refight:

Initial deployment was as follows..  Goodwin's sole foot regiment on the right flank - then cavalry in the middle, and the dragoons ready for a quick advance on his left. The sakers are deployed on his far right on a slight knoll..


In the village - following - the Royalists are limited in what they can do, so both regiments sit waiting while 'enjoying' the hectoring of the local monk.. 😁


I figured the real Goodwin wouldn't do anything before his sakers had done their work, so other than a general advance to just outside of musket range by his foot and horse, the only other major tactical move for my fictional Goodwin was to send his dragoons off to one flank - when the time came for an assault then an attack on two fronts could only help..  the following shows about move two., with the general advance by the horse and foot, and the flanking move by the dragoons..


..note the purple dice in front of the earthwork section in the following - the sakers are doing their stuff..


...and the plan worked surprisingly well - one of the trench sections has been blasted into nothingness (black pom poms - see following) and the sakers then switched what was left of their fire to the now unprotected Royalist foot regiments..

To forestall the inevitable, and because if they just sit there they're going to continue being shot at by the artillery, Belasyse's charge down the hill into Brooke's, but are repulsed bloodily and rout (see following - red dice). Meanwhile the Parliamentary dragoons are ready to climb the hill - the intention is to occupy the church, the cavalry also stand ready...


In the next turn Belasyse's recover their moral though, and halt shaken, only for Brooke's to then charge up the hill, banners flying (the mental image puts me in mind of Sir Bevil Grenville leading his Cornish regiments up that hill at Roundway 😊). Unlike the Cornishmen though, and against all the odds, Belasyse's stand and send the 'Butchers and Dyers' reeling down the hill in rout!

Regrettably though, it was all too late for the Royalists, the Parliamentary dragoons had now occupied the church and were peppering Gerard's with musket fire from their flank, and Goodwin's horse now charged up the hill causing Belasyse's to rout from the village and the hill. 

Then Gerard's also failed their morale and followed them, Gerard and Molyneaux cursing and trying to rally them as they went, and Goodwin advanced and took control of the village..


Just a small action in the greater picture of the war, but a much need propaganda fillip for Parliament I think..

Post Match Analysis:
  • what a fantastic little game - in the end we got nine full moves in, and I had no idea that the Parliamentarians would be so successful, but they did get good dice throws, the sakers were very effective, hitting 60-70% of the time 
  • still felt that it all rested on a knife edge though, so the scenario specific rules worked..
  • butchers bill was as you would expect - Parliament losing 6SP's, 50% casualties. The Royalists lost 3SP's, just less than 20% casualties (not counting the sakers in the overall total)
...and what actually happened??

Arriving before Brill on the 27th January, Goodwin had ordered Homestead’s foot regiment to assault the defences as the artillery opened a breach. Browne’s Dragoons were to stand-to until the breach was affected at which point they were to also launch their attack. Unfortunately, due to some confusion, the Parliamentary artillery did not concentrate its fire long enough to affect a breach and although Homestead’s men launched several charges, their firing was ineffective against the earthen defences. 

The fighting continued for two hours, but the Parliamentarians could make no impression on the defences. They were eventually forced to retreat due to the Royalist’s use of a smokescreen to drive away the attackers as detailed in a letter to Parliament: 

‘The Fight continued two houres, the Parliaments forces not giving way on one side in all that time; but at last the winde, and so the smoke being so in the face of them, which was made greater by wet straw which the enemy set on fire, they retreated, which the enemy perceiving made out after them in great triumph, pursuing them 4 miles with their horse...’  

(I wonder where that horse came from, reinforcements from Oxford I wonder?? Google tells me horses can trot at between 8 & 12 mph, and Brill was only 15 from Oxford - so given the battle/skirmish lasted a couple of hours that would have given the Royalists time to put a relief force together and also get there in time.. Theoretically.. 😏)

The Parliamentarians claimed that they lost between 10 and 17 dead including a captain, but the Royalists claimed (a probably highly exaggerated) 70 killed. 

Following the battle, the Royalist’s reinforced the garrison with cannon and sent tools to further improve the fortifications. 

Although Parliamentary forces moved up to Brill on a number of further occasions, the garrison was never attacked again and in April, needing troops to help relieve the besieged garrison at Reading, the King withdrew the garrison in order to reinforce the Oxford Army

Brill was not occupied again, except in passing, for the remainder of the war. 

More Reading:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

 Laters, as the young people are want to say...

Saturday, January 24

"Firing into the Brown" #98 - Siege of Portsmouth, Venner and stuff

"So Carnehan weeds out the pick of his men, and sets the two of the Army to show them drill and at the end of two weeks the men can manoeuvre about as well as Volunteers. So he marches with the Chief to a great big plain on the top of a mountain, and the Chiefs men rushes into a village and takes it; we three Martinis firing into the brown of the enemy".

Kipling "The Man Who Would Be King"

Time for another update..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Quelle domage... they've shelled
the Guildhall...!

This was fun... 

Originally published in 1895 to support a parliamentary election campaign (in Portsmouth), "The Siege of Portsmouth" was a local newspaper serialised story describing a fictional "what if" attack on Portsmouth/South Coast by a Franco-Russian invasion. 

Apparently "invasion fiction" as a genre was a big thing at the turn of the 19th/20th Century (I had no idea). 

According to Wiki "..between 1871 and 1914 more than 60 works of fiction for adult readers describing various invasions of Great Britain were published" ("War of the Worlds" published in 1898 is probably the best known), and this story is another example. 

...happily it survived..😁 
It is unusual in its level of detail of the military engagements, but I strongly suspect that is to do with the setting (Portsmouth), and more specifically the forts and Dockyard - the story quite clearly has a political axe to grind with regard to inadequate spending on armaments and defence. 

It describes the heavy shelling of Portsmouth, Southsea and Eastney and the partial destruction of the Solent forts, and much local detail is included presumably to bring it home to the readership how they might be impacted if they didn't vote for the right man😁. I was fascinated to see that the French landing site for example is given as Emsworth, which is just down the road from where I live.. 

Can't help thinking that as a campaign setting/background for a wargame it's second to none.. 

It's available as a free PDF download if you fancy it.. be aware - it is jingoistic to the max as you would expect for late Victorian (😁)..  8/10


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

When I was doing the unit history on Sir Edward Dering's Regiment of Foot [clicky] back in the day I had cause to mention that their second Colonel, Samuel Venner, looked like he had an interesting background - so I thought I'd do a little digging..

He was a key leader in the Monmouth Rebellion of 1685 being part of Monmouth's Council of War. He apparently fought bravely at Bridport, where he was wounded in the stomach by a sniper (but in return shot & killed his assailant, one Edward Coker).

He later advised Monmouth to flee, though his counsel was rejected. 

Sent on a secret mission to London, he managed to avoid capture at Sedgemoor, and escaped to Holland joining William of Orange's army. Excluded from King James II's pardons, he remained in exile until the Glorious Revolution of 1688 secured his safety. 

His Colonelcy of Derring's (which seems to have been largely ornamental) was preceded by a spell as Colonel of a Regiment of Foot in Ireland during the Nine Years War, and then, slightly surprisingly, as governor of 'His Majesty's Hospital for Sick and Wounded Men in Ireland' (Royal Hospital Kilmainham in Dublin)

...this is in Bridport Church..

It may have been that experience, that lead to his subsequent post as 'Intendant of Hospitals' in Flanders following the sacking of the previous incumbent for corruption (😏). William had issued orders for hospitals to be built, and Venner was in charge of there running..

Unfortunately, my reading would indicate [clicky] that Venner was as corrupt and unpleasant as the previous incumbent... 

.."once he was in post the avaricious side of his personality soon came to the fore and he quickly demonstrated a talent for emulating his predecessor's penchant for spending other people's money on improving his personal life-style and comfort"... 😁

..this gives us the reason as to why his Colonelcy of Dering's was so short - he lead them for a mere four years between 1691 and 1695 - as he was formally relieved of his Intendant post following the number of complaints. He was then charged with bribery and corruption involving regimental agents, was relieved of the command of his regiment, and finally, cashiered.

Not all of these guys from the past were spotless.. 😁

More Reading:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

 Laters, as the young people are want to say...

Monday, January 19

Henry's "Wargaming Campaigns" book - dirt cheap!

Just a quicky, as I have no idea how long it will be available at this price  and thought people might like to get it.....  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

 Laters, as the young people are want to say...

Monday, January 12

I have been to... Gosport No. 1 Bastion

"Bastion(ˈbΓ¦stΙͺΙ™n IPA Pronunciation Guide) [noun]
1. a projecting work in a fortification designed to permit fire to the flanks along the face of the wall
2. any fortified place
3. a thing or person regarded as upholding or defending an attitude, principle, etc the last bastion of opposition.

Collins English Dictionary

Time for another update..  and he's been a explorin' 😁

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

...and so starts a little project to amble around and discover what's left of the Lines protecting the town that's on the other side of the Harbour from Portsmouth - Gosport..  it stands to reason that these would have existed in abundance, and not inconsiderable strength, as this side of the Harbour housed the Royal Navy's victualling yards, and also their main arsenal.

But we love a map - so let's start with one...  Bastion No. 1 (sometimes known as Trinity Bastion - named after the Church just north of it) is circled, North is top of page, so this Bastion was the one closest to the Harbour entrance while still remaining within the boundaries of the Harbour. 


The other side of the body of water labelled Haslar Creek in the map, is where Fort Blockhouse is now sited, and this would have dominated the actual entrance, so my assumption is that Bastion No. 1 was intended for defence in depth - if anything managed to get through the entrance, this was what the Bastion was there to oppose..

So when was it first built? Most of the fortifications in both the Portsmouth and Gosport Lines originate with de Gomme (we've met him already [clicky]) and that's the case for this Bastion as well. Building probably started some time around 1678, as one part of the aforementioned Gosport Lines, and at the beginning was probably no more than a "rampart 10-11 ft. high without a parapet and a moat, partly wet and partly dry, 30 ft. wide and 11 ft. deep" (source below). It's probable, the Lines as de Gomme designed them, were never actually completed (they certainly weren't when Charles II visited in 1683) - but work to complete them continued after the deaths of both de Gomme and Charles.


Second development phase kicks off in 1748, with a major redesign of the de Gomme fortifications by one John Peter Desmaretz - a master engineer, he was Architect to the Ordnance Board (he'd also served with Marlborough at one time). The work continued for 50 odd years and Bastion No. 1 was part of the last work completed, and wasn't finished until the turn of the century (1802/3'ish). 

It "..mounted 14 guns in brick lined emplacements firing over the parapet. Expense magazines were built into the earth of the rampart behind the terreplein. A caponier to protect the sluice connecting the moat to Portsmouth Harbour was added ... Behind this caponier a section of the rampart and wall was used as a school of musketry".

The guns would originally have been 18 and 24pdr smoothbores (I suspect the 18's would have been replaced during the life of the Bastion, and by the end they would all have been 24's) of the type typical for Royal Navy warships of the day, but mounted on wooden or iron traversing carriages something like the following interpretation from one of the boards on the site - note the anchor pivot at the back

 Something is not quite right with the picture based on where the actual pivots are in relation to the retaining wall/rampart in the bastion.. 😁

I suspect it was more like this example - with the pivot at the front...


OK - enough rambling - on with the pictures..

The bastion is on two levels - 'ground' pictures following..
  • "Expense Magazine" on the left - used for preparing cartridges, filled with gunpowder - there are two of these in the bastion - one at each end...  double brick lined with an air space between to keep out damp, and a raised wooden floor
  • "Ready use" magazine on the right - a smaller structure, which would have held about 100 rounds of mixed type (case/cannister/round) - there are four of these spread evenly along, and construction was the same as the Expense Magazines

Second Expense Magazine at the eastern end of the bastion

Inside the first expense magazine - the wooden floor is gone but the supports can still be seen.. note also the rare examples of Royal Artillery Mk 1 deck chairs... 😁

The following shows a good view of the ground level of the bastion - looking west - a further two ready-use magazines can be seen on the left.. the gun platform is above..  note the ramp at the far end to allow movement of men/munitions and guns from ground to the gun ramp - or as it is known in the parlance (fort speak), the "terreplein" 😏


There is a second ramp at the other/eastern end, but it is not part of the current bastion grounds and is pretty overgrown and separated by a fence - you can just trace the ramp by looking at the fence line..


Climbing up the ramp to the terreplein gives you the following view.. this is the rampart that faces roughly west'ish - Trinity Church on the left to allow you to orientate yourself to the map at the beginning..


Detail - following - on one of the emplacements. See what I mean about the pin/swivel? I suspect that the carriage swung round that pin, from the front - and from the remains of the stones at the back, through an arc of about 90 degrees


The pins/swivels are in remarkable condition given they're over 200 years old


Another nice view of the terreplein, this time from the eastern end - so these guns would be facing south towards Haslar Creek


....then a scramble up on to the top - following shows the moat and front face looking roughly north west.. originally there would have been a berm at the bottom, all the way along, which was used by sentries guarding the moat


..the northwest end of the bastion is not currently accessible - the Haslar Gate would have been down there where the road is in the following. It marks the western edge of the Bastion - none of the plans show any emplacements on top of this - it was purely defensive..  the berm would have been where that rough path at the bottom is... 


...and this - following - is the retaining wall behind it..  the Haslar Gate would have been where that house is


At the eastern end of the Bastion are some later additions that are not strictly part of  it other than the fact that they are connected physically.. this is it following.. note the gates for access..


It was built about 1853 and was used as a musketry school, but it's primary purpose was to defend the sluice gate that would have been about where the modern bridge is...  that sluice maintained the water levels in the moat.


This - following - is a view of it from the mentioned bridge.. ramparts for the bastion to the left - the defensive positions for the sluice are the loopholes, which are in a caponier (of which only this one remains - there would originally have been another, the other side of the bridge)..


...and here's the view of the inside of the caponier..


Last of all, I thought this - following - was good. It depicts the Bastion in, I think looking at the ships, the early 19th Century, maybe even after it was first completed.. note the retaining wall, the Vicarage (the grey building by the flag pole), and the top of the Haslar Gate (the brown square with white corners) providing access to the bridge


...and a couple of the excellent interpretation boards on site..



The death knell for the Bastion would have been the same as for the Portsmouth fortifications - the 1859 Defence Review. The Review had advised the building of replacement 'Advanced Lines' for Gosport - further out from the town due to advances in gunnery/artillery technology. Basically the same reason they started the Hilsea Lines - everything was moving further out from the thing they were defending..

It's likely the guns were removed as early as 1858, but what saved the Bastion was it's connection to Trinity Church - the Vicarage formed a major part of the rear of the Bastion (and still does - it's a very handsome building), but although it was sequestered by the Army, when the Bastion fell out of use, the Vicarage was returned to the church and the Bastion became it's private garden..

Further Reading:

Both of these are good..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

 Laters, as the young people are want to say...